Choose DigitalOcean if you want managed databases or need an Oceania deployment. Choose Hetzner if its locations suit your users, you can handle database operations yourself, and reducing the matched plan’s ongoing cost matters more.

| Criterion | DigitalOcean | Hetzner |
|---|---|---|
| True 3-year price, like-for-like plan | $864 (Basic Regular 4 GiB) | $806 (CPX22) ✓ |
| Regions | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Uptime SLA | 99.99% ✓ | 99.9% |
| Developer features | 8 of 8 ✓ | 7 of 8 |
| Managed databases | Yes ✓ | No |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Support channels | 2 | 3 ✓ |
Providers change prices often, and we regularly verify prices against their own pricing pages, though small differences from current prices are possible. Prices checked 10 Oct 2026. Three-year prices in US dollars at a fixed exchange rate.
The practical difference is how much you want the provider to operate. DigitalOcean offers managed databases; Hetzner does not. If database administration competes with shipping your product, that makes DigitalOcean easier to justify. For apps, sites and agents you operate yourself, the deployment essentials overlap: root access, SSH, an API, a CLI, Terraform and Docker support. Hetzner therefore fits teams comfortable owning the database alongside the application. DigitalOcean’s managed option can reduce that workload, but you still need to configure access and plan for application failures.
The matched comparison puts DigitalOcean’s Basic Regular 4 GiB at $864 and Hetzner’s CPX22 at $806 over the comparison period, expressed in USD. Hetzner is cheaper here, but the gap is modest enough that operational needs should decide the purchase. Treat these totals as the plan comparison, rather than a complete application budget: backups, snapshots and any managed database need separate consideration. Hetzner’s listed plan prices apply to Europe, while its Asia offering has different pricing and transfer allowances. Check the intended location before carrying the saving into your budget.
Location and support can settle the choice before price does. DigitalOcean covers Oceania as well as North America, Europe and Asia; Hetzner covers Europe, North America and Asia. Choose a suitable location for your users and dependencies, then test your application there. DigitalOcean’s uptime SLA is 99.99%, compared with Hetzner’s 99.9%, but a contractual target does not establish how your application will perform. Support channels also differ: DigitalOcean lists ticket and chat, while Hetzner lists ticket, email and phone. Pick the channels your team can use without assuming they establish response speed.
Yes, for the matched plans: Hetzner costs $806 against DigitalOcean’s $864 over the comparison period in USD. That conclusion applies to this match; check your deployment location and the services you intend to add before choosing on cost.
Choose DigitalOcean if you want a managed database from your hosting provider. Hetzner suits you if you can operate the database yourself or arrange database hosting separately. Include that operational work when weighing the plan saving.
Either can run Docker workloads on its VPS plans, with SSH and automation tools available for deployment. Hetzner is a reasonable choice for workloads you operate yourself when its locations fit; DigitalOcean makes more sense when managed databases or an Oceania location are part of the requirement.
Neither offers a free tier. For an ongoing app, site or agent, budget for paid usage and include the backup or database services your deployment needs.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.